Let’s get this out of the way from the start: I was a staunch supporter of David Quinn. So, when Chris Drury made the call to part ways with Quinn, I wasn’t exactly celebrating. And when Gerard Gallant was brought in to replace him, let’s just say my reaction was somewhere between disappointment and a groan loud enough to rattle the rafters at Madison Square Garden. Now, with Peter Laviolette in the mix, I’m cautiously optimistic—he’s got the pedigree, the experience, and a glare that could freeze water. But here’s the thing: This is about more than just coaching changes. In Drury’s three-plus seasons as Rangers GM, it feels like he’s taken the team further away from the long-term vision that Jeff Gorton and John Davidson had laid out. Let’s take a closer look at Drury’s player moves and coaching decisions, and see if we can make sense of what exactly is going wrong in his attempt to steer the ship.
Beyond the coaching changes, my frustrations with the Rangers run deeper. I was 100% behind the blueprint embraced by now-former team president John Davidson and now-former general manager Jeff Gorton. Both were dismissed just three years after "The Letter" and a mere two years after luring Davidson from Columbus to oversee the rebuilding program. I still firmly believe that if left untouched, their vision would have led to a Stanley Cup. These past two weeks, with Chris Drury's baffling trades of Jacob Trouba and Kaapo Kakko, have only reinforced what I’ve felt since day one: the Rangers will never win a Stanley Cup with Chris Drury in charge.
Chris Drury’s tenure as Rangers GM can be described as a constant cycle of short-term fixes and long-term confusion, a series of moves that leave fans and analysts alike scratching their heads. Let’s start by looking at some of his biggest transactions, beginning with the trade of Alexandar Georgiev to Colorado on July 7, 2022. In exchange for the backup goalie, Drury acquired a couple of third-round picks and a fifth-rounder. While it was good to get something in return for a player whose departure seemed inevitable months earlier, the question remains: What has come of those picks? So far, nothing of significance.
Then there’s the deal involving Maxim Letunov and Tarmo Reunanen in March 2022. It barely made a ripple in the transaction world. On the same day, Drury acquired Justin Braun from Philadelphia for a 2023 third-round pick. Braun was serviceable, but spending a third-round pick on a rental defenseman felt like buying a luxury car for a short commute.
But perhaps Drury’s most puzzling moves came on March 21, 2022, with the trade for Andrew Copp and Tyler Motte. Copp was brought in with a sixth-round pick for Morgan Barron, two conditional seconds (one of which turned into a first), and a 2023 fifth-round pick. Copp played well, but he was a rental, and the Jets got a fantastic return. Meanwhile, Motte’s acquisition for a fourth-round pick was a case of paying for energy—a commodity you can get cheaper elsewhere.
Another head-scratcher was the deal for Frank Vatrano in exchange for a 2022 fourth-round pick, which was decent but didn’t move the needle. Ryan Reaves, acquired for a 2022 third-round pick, was a bigger misstep. Drury overpaid for a player who specialized in toughness—a trait that’s lost its value in the modern NHL. Reaves may have been effective in his role, but paying a premium for an enforcer in today’s game is a questionable move at best.
Then came the franchise-altering mistake of trading Pavel Buchnevich to St. Louis on July 23, 2021, for Sammy Blais and a 2022 second-round pick. Buchnevich has since become a star in St. Louis, while Blais was often injured or invisible. This trade continues to haunt Drury as one of the worst in recent memory.
Brett Howden was shipped to Vegas on July 17, 2021, for Nick DeSimone and a 2022 fourth-rounder, which was a fine move, as it got Howden out of the organization. But even that trade didn’t amount to much in the grand scheme. Barclay Goodrow was brought in from Tampa Bay for a seventh-rounder the same day, but Drury compounded the mistake by signing him to a bloated six-year deal worth $3.6 million annually, complete with a partial no-trade clause. Overpaying a versatile forward is one thing, but handing him a hefty contract and a no-trade clause was a move that didn’t sit right.
Fast forward to 2023, and Drury found himself digging deeper into the mess he created. He struggled to shed Goodrow’s salary and ultimately placed him on waivers, sending him to San Jose—one of the teams Goodrow had specifically listed as a “no-go” on his no-trade clause. Goodrow’s displeasure with how things went down was understandable, and while he moved on, the Rangers’ handling of the situation lacked class and left a sour taste.
This short-term thinking continued with the trade of Jacob Trouba, the team’s captain, to the Anaheim Ducks earlier this month. Trouba, a valuable leader and contributor, was suddenly held out of the lineup and eventually traded for defenseman Urho Vaakanainen and a fourth-round pick. The return felt underwhelming, especially considering Trouba’s leadership and importance to the team. The whole situation was exacerbated by Drury’s reported threat to place Trouba on waivers if a deal couldn’t be made.
And now, in December 2024, another trade leaves fans scratching their heads: Kaapo Kakko, the 23-year-old winger with plenty of untapped potential, was shipped to the Seattle Kraken for defenseman Will Borgen, a third-round pick, and a sixth-round pick in the 2025 draft. Kakko may not have fully realized his potential in New York, but at just 23, he was still showing signs of growth. His consistent play as a third-liner this season and his selection to Team Finland for the 4 Nations Face-Off tournament indicated that he was starting to turn a corner. Yet, the Rangers opted to trade him for a bottom-pairing defenseman and some mid-to-late draft picks, which feels like a step backward. Borgen, who has regressed this season, does not seem to fit the Rangers’ needs in a meaningful way.
The Rangers’ reasoning for the trade, citing Kakko’s frustration with his role and his upcoming restricted free agency, feels like a scapegoating move rather than addressing the team’s larger issues. The team’s immediate needs won’t be solved by Borgen, and the long-term vision of the franchise feels even murkier with this trade.
Looking back at 2023, Drury made another questionable series of moves, such as the Patrick Kane trade, which looked flashy at the time but ultimately added little value given Kane’s injury and declining performance. The additions of Vladimir Tarasenko and Niko Mikkola were similarly short-term in nature, with little lasting impact.
Drury’s tenure is marked by a series of moves that suggest a preference for immediate gratification over long-term planning. The Buchnevich trade alone should be enough to disqualify him from being regarded as a “visionary GM.” The lack of real long-term payoff from most of these transactions highlights a troubling trend: Drury has been more focused on chasing short-term success than laying the foundation for a sustained, championship-contending team.And while player moves have been a central part of the equation, the coaching decisions under Drury’s watch have been just as telling, if not more so. Let’s now shift our focus to the carousel of head coaches Drury has overseen, and how his choices (or lack thereof) may have further muddied the team’s long-term direction.
Chris Drury’s decision to fire David Quinn as head coach of the Rangers felt a little like shooting the messenger. After all, Quinn was doing exactly what he was hired to do: overseeing the development of a young, talented roster. So why get rid of the guy who was finally making progress? Well, because apparently, patience isn’t a virtue in the Rangers’ front office. No, Dolan and Drury wanted more. They wanted results now. And that’s where Quinn’s three-year tenure hit a brick wall.
Let’s face it: Quinn’s record of 96-87-25 may not have been the kind of numbers that get you a parade down Broadway, but it’s important to consider what he was up against. The goal was never to win a Cup right away. The plan was to build something sustainable, and Quinn had plenty of raw talent at his disposal—Fox, Kakko, Lafrenière, Miller, and the crown jewel, Igor Shesterkin. These were players who, under Quinn’s watch, were getting better and more comfortable with NHL life. But that’s not always an overnight process, especially when you’re navigating a pandemic-shortened season and trying to get young stars to play a style that demands discipline and consistency.
Still, Quinn was getting the most out of these guys, particularly with the transition in goal from Henrik Lundqvist to Shesterkin. Under Quinn’s guidance, Shesterkin was able to develop into the cornerstone goalie the Rangers have been craving for years. Not bad, right? Yet, it wasn’t enough to save Quinn’s job.
If Quinn had been given another year, who’s to say he wouldn’t have ironed out some of these kinks? After all, he was already seeing success with his young core. But instead of giving Quinn that chance, Dolan and Drury pulled the plug, apparently willing to risk another year of transition for the sake of a "culture change." What does that even mean, anyway? It’s not like Quinn was running a frat house out there. He was getting young players like Lafrenière to adjust to the speed of the NHL, and players like Adam Fox were growing into the kind of defenseman that every team dreams about. And yet, those successes got overlooked in favor of a quick fix.
Firing Quinn was a classic case of short-term thinking. The Rangers could’ve been patient, allowed Quinn to finish what he started, and then evaluated things at the end of his contract. Instead, Drury opted for a change, but here’s the thing: despite the turnover behind the bench, the progression of the core players has been strikingly similar under the two coaches that followed Quinn. In fact, one could argue that had Quinn remained in charge, we might have seen little difference in the development of the team’s key players. This raises the question: were these coaching changes really necessary, or did the Rangers simply fall victim to the allure of immediate results without recognizing the continuity that was already in place? Let’s dig into how the core group of players has fared under Gallant and Laviolette—and whether it really would have been any different under Quinn.
Let’s break down the head coaches:
David Quinn: The developmental guy. He was here to teach the kids and maybe steal a few wins along the way. While his tenure wasn’t marked by playoff glory, he did manage to develop some key players during a period of rebuilding. The likes of Adam Fox, K'Andre Miller, and Alexis Lafreniere all saw significant growth under Quinn’s watch. His job wasn’t to win the Cup right away, but to lay the groundwork for a future contender. Was that such a bad plan? Not in my book. The fact that Quinn didn’t have immediate postseason success doesn't erase the progress he made, especially with a team so clearly in transition.
Gerard Gallant: The players' coach with a wealth of experience, Gallant's first two seasons with the Rangers offered a mix of highs and lows. In 2021-22, he led the Rangers to a 52-24-6 record, finishing 2nd in the NHL Metropolitan Division with 110 points. Despite the team’s success during the regular season, Gallant’s squad fell short in the Conference Finals, losing 4-2 to the Tampa Bay Lightning. The team did manage to grind through a tough playoff path, defeating the Pittsburgh Penguins in Round 1 (4-3) and the Carolina Hurricanes in Round 2 (4-3). Gallant’s ability to get the team through these tough series was a testament to his leadership, though the Rangers’ playoff run ultimately ended in disappointment.
In his second season (2022-23), the Rangers posted a strong 47-22-13 record, good for 3rd place in the Metropolitan Division with 107 points. They scored 273 goals (12th in the NHL) and allowed 216 (4th), showing a balanced approach. However, the postseason proved to be Gallant's downfall. After a regular season that looked promising, the Rangers’ playoff run was abruptly halted in the first round, where they lost 4-3 to the New Jersey Devils.
Gallant was a steady force behind the bench in the regular season, but his failure to adapt in key playoff situations—especially during the loss to the Devils—left fans wondering whether his methods were truly suited for the postseason. His time in New York was a curious mix of success and frustration, with many questioning whether the lack of postseason success in both years would eventually lead to his departure. And as the seasons passed, his habit of juggling line combinations left some wondering if there was a lack of consistency and focus when it mattered most. Still, Gallant’s tenure, though marked by some good moments, ultimately failed to reach the heights the Rangers were hoping for.
Peter Laviolette: The new guy. Known for his discipline, structure, and a solid track record, Laviolette had a fantastic first season at the helm of the Rangers, leading them to a 55-23-4 record, finishing 1st in the NHL Metropolitan Division with 114 points. The Rangers ranked 7th in both goals scored (278) and goals allowed (226), highlighting the balanced approach Laviolette brought to the team. Under his leadership, the Rangers cruised through the first two rounds of the playoffs, sweeping the Washington Capitals in Round 1 (4-0) and defeating the Carolina Hurricanes in Round 2 (4-2). Unfortunately, their run ended in the Conference Finals with a 4-2 loss to the Florida Panthers, falling short of the Stanley Cup Finals. While his first season was a huge success, this season has been a different story. The team is struggling at 15-15-1 and sitting outside of a wildcard spot. It’s been a sharp contrast to last year’s high expectations. Now, with a less-than-ideal start to this season, the real test will be whether he can replicate that success and lead the Rangers to the next level. Will his system prove adaptable enough to get the team back on track, or is the magic from his first year just a distant memory? Only time will tell. It's worth noting that Laviolette is the fastest of the three coaches to reach 15 losses in a season. Interestingly, this is the first time a Rangers team has hit 15 losses this quickly since the 2013-14 season, when under Alain Vigneault, the team was also 15-15-1 after 31 games. That team went on to finish 45-31-6, with 96 points, and made it all the way to the Stanley Cup Finals. Could history repeat itself? Or are we on track for another offseason of excuses instead of celebration?
As we move forward, let’s consider the key theme here: despite the coaching carousel, the development of the Rangers’ core group of players has been largely the same. This raises an important question: if Quinn had been allowed to finish his work, would we really be in a different place? Would the team have progressed any differently? Or is this simply the nature of rebuilding—slow and steady with the occasional hiccup along the way? Let’s dive into the numbers and see how these players have fared under three different coaching regimes.With that in mind, let’s take a closer look at some of the core Players: Same Cast, Different Directors
When it comes to assessing the performance of the Rangers' core players under the guidance of three different head coaches—David Quinn, Gerard Gallant, and Peter Laviolette—it's crucial to look at not just the raw numbers but the broader context of their age, development, and the style each coach implemented. Each player on this list has had a unique journey, but despite the coaching changes, their statistical progression suggests that they might have followed the same developmental arc under one stable coach.
Mika Zibanejad
David Quinn (2018-2020): In Quinn's first two seasons, Zibanejad posted impressive numbers, including a career-high 41 goals in 2019-20, accompanied by 34 assists (75 points). Under Quinn, Zibanejad was asked to take on more responsibility as the team's primary offensive weapon, and his production reflected that, especially in the second season.
Gerard Gallant (2021-2023): Under Gallant, Zibanejad continued to be a force offensively, posting 24 goals and 52 points in 2021-22, and 26 goals and 49 points in 2022-23. His production remained consistent, even as the team shuffled lineups.
Peter Laviolette (2023-present): Zibanejad's early returns under Laviolette show him continuing to be a key offensive player. Despite the team's inconsistent play, his leadership and production have remained stable.
Takeaway: Zibanejad’s development trajectory would have likely been similar under one stable coach. His goal-scoring prowess has been a constant, and his ability to remain effective even during coaching changes points to his natural talent and leadership.
Chris Kreider
David Quinn (2018-2020): Kreider’s production under Quinn was solid but somewhat inconsistent, especially in the 2018-19 season when he put up 28 goals but had a relatively modest 23 assists. His overall game remained more physical than offensive.
Gerard Gallant (2021-2023): Kreider’s performance soared under Gallant, particularly in 2021-22, when he posted a career-high 52 goals and 25 assists (77 points). Kreider thrived in Gallant's system, becoming a consistent top-line presence.
Peter Laviolette (2023-present): Kreider's production took a slight dip under Laviolette’s early tenure. However, as the season progresses, he remains a key figure on the power play and in net-front battles, but his overall scoring touch has been slightly less potent.
Takeaway: Kreider's scoring and overall play may have had a similar arc under one coach, but Gallant’s systems seemed to allow him to maximize his potential. His success under Gallant likely wouldn’t have been as pronounced under Quinn, but his physical style and leadership would have made him a reliable piece of the puzzle regardless.
Artemi Panarin
David Quinn (2018-2020): Panarin immediately emerged as the Rangers' top playmaker under Quinn, posting 95 points in his first season (2019-2020). His combination of playmaking and scoring was unmatched, and he was the focal point of the Rangers' offense.
Gerard Gallant (2021-2023): Under Gallant, Panarin maintained his elite production, with 74 points in 2021-22 and 92 points in 2022-23. He was still the offensive engine, though his defensive game wasn’t as refined under Gallant.
Peter Laviolette (2023-present): Panarin's numbers under Laviolette have been somewhat slower to develop, with the team still finding its rhythm. However, Panarin's individual brilliance has remained largely intact.
Takeaway: Panarin’s production would have likely been similar under any coach. His elite talent and playmaking ability have been consistent, and the team has relied on him to drive offense, regardless of the coach.
Adam Fox
David Quinn (2018-2020): Fox’s emergence as one of the top defensemen in the league began under Quinn. His ability to control the play from the blue line, while also being a key power-play contributor, was evident early on, despite the team’s struggles.
Gerard Gallant (2021-2023): Fox continued to grow as an all-around defenseman under Gallant, posting 74 points in 2021-22 and 69 in 2022-23. He became one of the league's top defensemen, leading the team in ice time and power-play points.
Peter Laviolette (2023-present): Fox remains the Rangers’ top defenseman under Laviolette, logging heavy minutes and continuing to be a key contributor on both ends of the ice. His numbers continue to reflect his high skill level.
Takeaway: Fox’s growth was likely going to happen regardless of who was coaching. His skill set and hockey IQ have made him a consistent and integral part of the Rangers' blue line, and his production has been solid under all three coaches.
Ryan Lindgren
David Quinn (2018-2020): Lindgren’s role under Quinn was primarily as a shutdown defenseman, paired with Fox. While not known for his offensive stats, he became a reliable defensive presence, particularly in physical battles.
Gerard Gallant (2021-2023): Lindgren’s game didn’t change much under Gallant, but he did see more ice time and responsibility in the defensive zone. He added a little more physicality but didn’t put up major offensive numbers.
Peter Laviolette (2023-present): Lindgren's role under Laviolette remains the same. He’s still the physical force on the back end, not a major point producer but integral to the team's defensive structure.
Takeaway: Lindgren's role was always going to be the same, regardless of coaching change. He’s a defensive stalwart, and his impact is often felt more in his physicality and shot-blocking than in his stat line.
Zach Jones
David Quinn (2018-2020): Jones was still in development during Quinn’s time, but Quinn’s focus on younger players meant Jones got a chance to prove himself. However, his NHL impact was limited to the occasional call-up.
Gerard Gallant (2021-2023): Jones continued to develop, often showing flashes of his potential in limited ice time. Gallant’s systems didn’t always seem to suit his skill set, but he remained a young, developing defenseman.
Peter Laviolette (2023-present): Jones' development has been slower under Laviolette, with the team focusing more on defensive stability and less on developing younger players for the time being.
Takeaway: Jones' development would likely have been a similar pace under Quinn. His growth is a work in progress, and with more consistent ice time, his trajectory could have been expedited under any coach.
Igor Shesterkin
David Quinn (2018-2020): Shesterkin’s NHL arrival came under Quinn, and he showed flashes of brilliance, becoming the team’s number-one goalie by the end of Quinn’s tenure. His potential was clear, though the team wasn’t a contender yet.
Gerard Gallant (2021-2023): Shesterkin was a star under Gallant, winning the Vezina Trophy in 2022 and posting stellar numbers. His ability to steal games kept the Rangers competitive even when the offense faltered.
Peter Laviolette (2023-present): Shesterkin’s performance has remained consistent under Laviolette, though the team’s overall struggles have kept him from being the game-changer he was during the Gallant years.
Takeaway: Shesterkin’s growth trajectory would have been similar regardless of the coach. His exceptional talent and ability to elevate the team in key moments have remained a cornerstone of the Rangers’ success.
K'Andre Miller
David Quinn (2018-2020): Miller’s early development under Quinn was solid. While not yet the defensive force he is now, Quinn gave him a platform to grow and learn in the NHL.
Gerard Gallant (2021-2023): Miller’s confidence grew under Gallant, and his offensive game began to emerge. He became a key component of the Rangers’ defense and showed strong growth in his two-way play.
Peter Laviolette (2023-present): Miller continues to develop under Laviolette and has emerged as one of the top defensemen. His offensive contributions have increased, but his defensive game remains his calling card.
Takeaway: Miller’s growth trajectory would have been similar under one coach. His natural ability and physical presence have allowed him to become a key defenseman for the Rangers.
Alexis Lafrenière
David Quinn (2018-2020): Lafrenière’s development under Quinn was expectedly slow as he adjusted to the NHL. In his first season (2020-2021), he posted 12 goals and 9 assists in 56 games, showing flashes of his high-end skill but struggling with consistency. Quinn placed him in various roles, and while he was a solid contributor, Lafrenière often found himself in the bottom-six or on the third line.
Gerard Gallant (2021-2023): Under Gallant, Lafrenière was given more opportunities in the top-six and showcased his growth, improving his production to 19 goals and 23 assists in 2021-22, and 16 goals and 23 assists in 2022-23. Gallant’s system allowed Lafrenière to play with more skilled linemates, which helped his confidence grow. However, his inconsistency remained a concern at times, and he was sometimes relegated to a bottom-six role if he wasn’t producing.
Peter Laviolette (2023-present): Under Laviolette, Lafrenière continues to show promise, but his growth has been somewhat stunted by the team’s struggles early on. His role remains more fluid, as Laviolette looks for consistency from his younger players. Lafrenière’s offensive contributions have been modest, but his defensive play and maturity have been key components of his development.
Takeaway: Lafrenière’s growth trajectory has been relatively steady under all three coaches, though his development might have been quicker with more stability. His skill set has always been evident, but finding consistency and becoming an offensive driver have been works in progress. A longer stint with one coach could have provided him with more confidence and offensive opportunities to fully develop his potential.
Filip Chytil
David Quinn (2018-2020): Chytil's early years under Quinn saw him struggle to find consistency. In his first full NHL season (2018-2019), Chytil flashed his potential with 22 points (9 goals, 13 assists) in 75 games, but his overall game was inconsistent, and he found himself bouncing between the top-nine and the bottom-six forward group. Quinn’s emphasis on younger players provided Chytil with some opportunities, but he wasn’t given the same responsibilities as other players like Zibanejad or Panarin.
Gerard Gallant (2021-2023): Chytil’s growth under Gallant was noticeable, as he became more of a key contributor to the Rangers’ middle-six, especially in the 2021-2022 season. He posted 22 goals and 19 assists in 2022-23, his best offensive season to date. Gallant trusted Chytil in key situations and allowed him to develop as a more complete player. The opportunity to play with better linemates on a deeper team also helped elevate his game.
Peter Laviolette (2023-present): Under Laviolette, Chytil has been asked to further elevate his play, but the team’s early struggles have made it harder for him to consistently find a rhythm. His role has fluctuated, but he continues to show flashes of brilliance, particularly in transition and offensive zone time. His scoring has been somewhat streaky, but he remains a key part of the Rangers’ middle-six.
Takeaway: Chytil’s development has been more gradual under each coach. He’s always had potential, but his consistency and role within the lineup have evolved over time. While Laviolette’s system has yet to allow him to reach his full potential, Chytil’s trajectory has shown improvement regardless of coaching changes. With a steady environment, he could have grown more consistently, but his current trajectory still reflects growth and potential.
Kaapo Kakko (Traded)
David Quinn (2018-2020): Kakko’s early years were a mix of promise and growing pains under Quinn. While he showed flashes of brilliance, his development was slow, and his offensive output didn’t reflect his potential.
Gerard Gallant (2021-2023): Kakko showed more consistency under Gallant, contributing offensively and rounding out his game. His defensive play improved, but his scoring remained streaky.
Peter Laviolette (2023-present): Kakko’s early returns under Laviolette showed his continued development, but his overall impact remained inconsistent. However, his recent trade suggests that the Rangers' patience with his development had run its course.
Takeaway: Kakko’s development was always going to be slow and steady, and his trajectory might have looked the same under any coach. However, Gallant’s ability to keep him in the top-six provided him with more opportunities to find consistency.
Jacob Trouba (Traded)
David Quinn (2018-2020): Trouba’s first years with the Rangers were under Quinn, where he quickly became the team’s captain. His leadership and physical play were assets, but his offensive numbers were modest.
Gerard Gallant (2021-2023): Trouba continued to develop into a reliable leader and defensive presence under Gallant. His offensive production remained steady, and his leadership was critical, especially in the 2022 playoff run.
Peter Laviolette (2023-present): Trouba’s role as captain has continued under Laviolette. His defensive consistency has been vital, but his offensive production has not drastically changed.
Takeaway: Trouba’s development arc would have likely been the same under any coach. His leadership, physicality, and defensive reliability have been the backbone of the Rangers' defensive unit.
In conclusion, while it’s impossible to say for certain, it’s highly likely that the core players—Zibanejad, Kreider, Panarin, Fox, Lindgren, Shesterkin, Miller, Lafrenière, and Chytil—would have developed at a similar pace under David Quinn had he been given more time. The natural progression of these players, coupled with the guidance of a front office that had a clear vision for sustained success, would have allowed them to continue growing into the stars they are today. In fact, with the right complementary pieces added over time, as we saw with Vinny Trocheck—one of Chris Drury’s few successful acquisitions—the Rangers could have been in a much better position to compete for a championship in the future.
The vision of Jeff Gorton and John Davidson, paired with Quinn’s development-first approach, set the Rangers on a path that seemed destined for long-term success. The team was on the right track, blending a mix of youth and experience while positioning themselves for a window of contention. Fast forward to today, and under Drury, the Rangers seem further from that original vision. Short-term decisions and constant changes to the coaching staff and roster have undermined the foundation that was being built. While it’s easy to argue that the Rangers are still a competitive team, it’s clear that the long-term blueprint established by Gorton, Davidson, and Quinn has been shifted off course under Drury’s watch. The question now remains: will the Rangers ever return to the path that seemed so promising just a few years ago, or has Drury's approach derailed the team’s potential for sustained success?
Comments